On 24 February 2026, a joint webinar hosted by the British Standards Institution (BSI) and NIMA attracted over 900 digital construction professionals from around the world. The subject was the proposed revision to ISO 19650 — the international standard that defines how information is managed in construction projects.
What was presented is not a minor update. It is a fundamental repositioning of how the construction industry thinks about digital delivery — one that has direct implications for every project team and asset owner across the GCC.
What ISO 19650 Is — And What It Has Been
ISO 19650 is the international standard for information management using building information modelling. Published initially in 2018, it defines the concepts, roles, and processes for how information is produced, exchanged, checked, and maintained across the lifecycle of a built asset.
For most of its existence, ISO 19650 has been understood — and sometimes misunderstood — as a BIM standard. A standard about models, software, and geometry. In reality, it has always been about information. The proposed 2026 revision makes that explicit.
The Key Changes Proposed in 2026
The proposed revisions address both terminology and structure:
BIM — Building Information Modelling is the central concept
Information Management (IM) replaces BIM as the central concept
Separate standards for delivery phase (Part 2) and operational phase (Part 3)
Unified process covering delivery and operations as a single continuous lifecycle
BIM Execution Plan (BEP) defines how BIM is delivered on a project
Information Production Plan — broader scope, information-centric
Projects are discrete delivery events with a handover at the end
Projects are interventions within a continuous asset lifecycle
"The question is no longer: did we deliver a model? The question becomes: does the information we created serve this asset for its entire lifetime? That shift changes everything about how a project is set up from day one."
What This Means in Practice for GCC Projects
The GCC construction market references ISO 19650 with increasing frequency in project contracts, procurement documents, and government frameworks. The proposed revision reinforces several principles that the most forward-thinking project owners in the region are already applying:
- Information requirements must be defined at the start — The Exchange Information Requirements (EIR) is not a handover checklist. It defines from day one what information the asset owner needs and in what format.
- The Asset Information Model is not a handover output — It is the ongoing source of truth that evolves throughout the life of the asset, starting from the first design decision.
- Asset owners carry greater responsibility — The revised standard places greater emphasis on appointing parties — clients and owners — defining clear, structured information requirements and governance frameworks upfront.
- Connected systems are required — Disconnected tools and file-based workflows will struggle to support the new unified process model.
The Connection to PMBOK 8
The direction of the ISO 19650 revision aligns precisely with PMBOK Guide Eighth Edition, published in 2025. PMBOK 8 reinforces the concept of Organisational Knowledge Repositories — structured information assets that serve not just the current project but the organisation's ongoing capability to deliver and manage built assets.
Both standards, independently, are arriving at the same conclusion: the future of construction is information-centric. Geometry is one component of that information. But the data attached to the geometry — the maintenance records, the equipment specifications, the compliance documentation, the operational parameters — is what makes a built asset genuinely useful to its owner.
What GCC Project Teams Should Do Now
The final ISO 19650 revision is not expected until 2027. But the principles it embeds are available today, and the most effective project teams are already implementing them:
- Define information requirements — not just model requirements — at project inception
- Structure the BIM Execution Plan around information delivery, not just software usage
- Plan the Asset Information Model from the first design stage, not at handover
- Engage the facilities management team before construction begins
- Select a Common Data Environment that supports the full asset lifecycle
The construction industry across the GCC is at a transition point. The standards, the technology, and the client expectations are all moving in the same direction. The teams that understand this shift — and implement it systematically — will define best practice in the region for the next decade.
Design BIM and Construction BIM — Where ISO 19650 Makes the Difference
One of the most common misconceptions in GCC project delivery is that BIM is a single unified process. In practice, Design BIM and Construction BIM are fundamentally different in purpose, responsibility, and information requirements — and ISO 19650 addresses exactly this gap.
In Design BIM, the model answers one question: does this design work? Coordination, clash detection, and documentation are the primary outputs. The model is developed to LOD 300 — geometrically accurate, information-structured, authority submission-ready.
In Construction BIM, the questions change entirely. Can this building actually be built — in the right sequence, without conflicts, and within the contract value? The model moves to LOD 400 (shop drawing coordination), with 4D construction sequence simulation and 5D cost integration added as independent information layers. These dimensions are not geometry progressions — they are information layers that answer the practical questions driving every construction decision.
The critical point that ISO 19650 makes explicit: both LOD 300 and LOD 400 are BIM 3D. The geometry evolves — but the dimension does not change. What changes is the information attached to the geometry, and who is responsible for maintaining it. This is why the standard moves away from LOD as the primary measure of delivery and toward information requirements — EIR, BEP, and ultimately the Asset Information Model — as the governing framework.
"The shift from Design BIM to Construction BIM is not just a change in geometry detail. It is a change in purpose, responsibility, and information ownership. ISO 19650 defines this transition — but most GCC projects still treat it as an automatic handover rather than a managed information event."
The Asset Information Model — The Real Destination
Every principle in ISO 19650 — from the EIR to the BEP to the Common Data Environment — ultimately serves one goal: delivering a structured, reliable Asset Information Model to the building owner at handover.
The AIM is not an additional deliverable. It is the accumulated result of managing information correctly across the full project lifecycle — from the first design decision to the last piece of equipment commissioned. When information is governed properly throughout design and construction, the AIM is simply what remains at handover. When it is not, the facilities management team inherits a physical building and almost no usable information to manage it.
In practice, most GCC projects are handed over at LOD 300 at best. The design model is archived. Construction records are scattered. The FM team conducts expensive surveys of a building that should already be fully documented. This gap — between what should be delivered and what actually is — is precisely what ISO 19650 is now structured to close.
The AIM contains what the building owner needs from day one: equipment specifications and serial numbers, maintenance schedules and warranty records, spatial data for FM operations, compliance and commissioning certificates. This is not aspirational — it is achievable when information management is planned from project inception, not retrofitted at handover.
What This Means for GCC AECO Professionals
The 2026 revision direction of ISO 19650 is not a future concern — it is a present reality for projects being set up today. The teams that will deliver successfully are the ones that start with the right questions:
- What information does the asset owner need at handover — and in what format?
- How will that information be structured, governed, and maintained through design and construction?
- Where does responsibility for the transition from Design BIM to Construction BIM sit — and who manages the information continuity across that boundary?
- Is the Common Data Environment structured to support the full asset lifecycle, not just the delivery phase?
These are not technical questions. They are project management and information governance questions — and they need answers at the start of a project, not at the end.
Further Reading
Explore related knowledge areas on BIM-enabled digital delivery, the Asset Information Model, and digital project control across the GCC.
Back to Knowledge Areas